Pages

Thursday, September 01, 2011

Various Links


Jessica from Read React Review will be teaching Jennifer Crusie's Bet Me as part of her Ethics and Fiction course:
I decided I wanted to do two things in this unit: (1) ask whether genre fiction is as worthy a subject of ethical criticism as literary fiction (Wayne Booth explicitly says no, and most other ethical critics implicitly reject this possibility), and (2) introduce feminist critique as a mode of ethical critique. I also wanted something fun, since pretty much everything else I assigned is a real downer. I think Bet Me is a fun book that can work in all of those ways.
Sarah Frantz was interviewed by Heidi Cullinan and mentioned that
I’ve got an academic anthology I edited coming out next year: New Approaches to Popular Romance Fiction. My article in there talks about Joey Hill’s BDSM romance, Holding the Cards. I’m ALSO in the (very slow) process of writing a book called ALPHA MALE: POWER AND MASCULINITY IN AMERICAN POPULAR ROMANCE FICTION. I’ll have a chapter in there about m/m romance.
Linda Hilton has posted about her Honours thesis (from 2000) and mentions that
I was able to read one romance novel after another and see where the woman’s voice had been silenced, her power neutralized, her body appropriated, her desires perverted --- BUT, I could also see where the woman’s power and autonomy had been left intact, where she had submitted only because she had no choice and because it was the way to maintain what little autonomy was granted to her.
On a related note, DM guestblogged at Dear Author about the "Defeated Heroine." She
used to dismiss Radway and her work as elitist and blinkered, but after a recent glom of Madeline Hunter’s Regencies, and Lara Adrian’s Breed books (Adrian’s series title kinda says it all…) I started to feel uncomfortable. There seemed to be a message in these books, conscious or unconscious on the part of the authors, that supported Radway’s conclusions.
Sunita wrote a post about "Jewish stereotypes in Georgette Heyer’s novels." She notes with regards to The Grand Sophy that
The Sourcebooks version changes Heyer’s original wording from
The instinct of his race made him prefer, whenever possible, to maintain a manner of the utmost urbanity,
to
His instinct made him prefer, whenever possible, to maintain a manner of the utmost urbanity,
But editors can’t do much about the name, and they keep the stereotypical descriptors, e.g., “greasy” and “ingratiating,” not to mention the “Semitic nose.”
Apart from the importance of analysing the depiction of race in romances, this post also reminded me that one can't assume that the text of a second or subsequent edition of a romance is identical to that of the original. I don't know if Sourcebooks indicate that their edition differs from the original but I've certainly come across examples of romances in which changes have been made to a subsequent edition and there is no way a reader would know this unless she/he compared the two editions.

Given the popularity of romances about SEALs, I thought I'd mention that
WAR-Net was founded in 2010 by Kate McLoughlin and Gill Plain as a virtual and actual forum for scholars based in northern England and Scotland working on war representation. It now welcomes members from all over the UK and the rest of the world.

Next WAR-Net Meeting: 'Battle-Lines: War and Conflict in Popular Texts and Images' on 1 October 2011 at the University of Dundee.
Romance novels sell well in the Philippines:
written in street-level Tagalog, the books emerged in the early 1980s when an economic crisis forced the importers of western "chick literature" paperbacks to seek out alternatives. [...]

Romance author Maia Jose, who began writing in 1990, said the genre centred on the build-up of a romantic relationship that must end either in marriage or in a commitment.

"The book must be 128 pages long and it's a formula, so it must have a happy ending. If it doesn't have a happy ending the reader would be offended," the mother-of-three said.

The authors typically do not have any formal writing background, with housewives, students and moonlighting accountants among a mixed bag of storytellers.

Jose said she generally took between two and four weeks to write a book, while one particularly prolific writer once churned out nearly 100 in a year. (AFP, via The Independent)

6 comments:

  1. Thank you very much for the mention, Laura!

    I wish I had more time to read and post over here. Everything is so interesting, even the topics I really know so little about. There is always so much more to learn.

    And maybe that's the kind of "change" that seems to some of us to be essential in romance -- as a comment on your previous topic. As a long, long, long time reader of romance, my expectations are always that the characters will grow and learn, even if they only learn more about themselves. That may not be a grand change of personality, but it is certainly a change from where they were on page 1.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I wish I had more time to read and post over here. Everything is so interesting, even the topics I really know so little about. There is always so much more to learn.

    And maybe that's the kind of "change" that seems to some of us to be essential in romance -- as a comment on your previous topic.


    Thanks, Linda. I suppose it's fair to say that Teach Me Tonight is committed to life-long learning. I do think there are different kinds of learning, though, and not all kinds lead to immense personal change.

    Or is the difference that the romance's character growth extends beyond the specificity of "coming of age," which is often associated with adolescence?

    Well, as you'd know better than I do, there is an association between female virginity and less-than-full womanhood, to the extent that perhaps one could consider some romances with virgin heroines to be, literally, "coming of age" stories.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Jonathan, I replied to your comment before I saw that it had been deleted. Sorry.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Thank you for the mention, Laura. I am hoping that students enjoy the Crusie, although whether they do has no bearing on how good of a book it is: after all, many of them hate reading Plato.

    I'm hoping that using a contemporary comedic romance may feel familiar and will encourage an open minded read. I know from teaching a romance novel last year that preconcevied ideas about the genre can be a big barrier to engaging with the specific text.

    ReplyDelete
  6. preconcevied ideas about the genre can be a big barrier to engaging with the specific text

    You mean people find what they expect to find (or, perhaps, don't notice some things because they're not expecting to find them)?

    ReplyDelete